Unclear technical scope
Services and dependencies may span websites, checkout, accounts and suppliers.
Technical accessibility work for the EU market
Assess and improve digital services in the context of the European Accessibility Act using a practical technical workstream.
Webmedic supports assessment, remediation planning and verification. Legal applicability remains a matter for qualified legal counsel.
Why a technical workstream is needed
Teams need a repeatable way to identify, remediate, verify and maintain the accessibility of customer-facing services.
Services and dependencies may span websites, checkout, accounts and suppliers.
Content, design, development and vendors may own different barriers.
Teams may lack a recorded scope, test method and retest outcome.
Accessibility can regress when it is not integrated into delivery.
What you receive
The scope is adapted to the digital service, delivery model and evidence already available.
A prioritised technical view of representative services and journeys.
Sequenced remediation work with dependencies and verification points.
Practical support for teams resolving confirmed barriers.
Retest notes and clearly documented remaining constraints.
Typical coverage
Customer journeys, content, interfaces, third-party dependencies and release processes.
Headings, landmarks, names, roles, states and relationships.
Instructions, alternatives, contrast, zoom and responsive reflow.
Order, visibility, navigation, dialogs and custom interactions.
Labels, required fields, validation, summaries and recovery.
Screen reader output, announcements and dynamic changes.
Mobile layouts, orientation, reflow and touch targets.
Process
The exact environments, roles, journeys and deliverables are agreed before testing.
Confirm priority pages, components, roles and user journeys.
Set up safe environments, accounts, data and known constraints.
Run the agreed automated, keyboard, responsive and assistive technology checks.
Record actionable findings or apply agreed changes in the responsible layer.
Retest the original behaviour and complete affected journeys.
Who it is for
The scope is adapted to the product, platform, team and delivery stage.
Why Webmedic
Findings are written for action and consider shared components, application state and delivery constraints.
User impact is connected to the responsible code and component behaviour.
Location, state, reproduction steps and expected behaviour are recorded.
Repeated defects are grouped so shared causes can be addressed first.
Agreed fixes can be retested against the original acceptance criteria.
Technical and legal scope
The service applies to the agreed pages, components, roles, content and tested version. New releases can introduce new barriers.
Third-party widgets and closed components can be assessed, but remediation may depend on the supplier or available extension points.
Webmedic provides technical accessibility assessment and implementation support using WCAG 2.2 Level AA as the primary reference. This is not legal advice, legal certification or a guarantee of compliance.
Frequently asked questions
Before work starts, we agree the scope, pages, user journeys, deliverables and responsibility for implementation.
Ask another questionNo. Legal applicability should be confirmed with qualified legal counsel. Webmedic focuses on technical accessibility.
WCAG 2.2 Level AA is the primary technical reference, with the exact scope agreed in advance.
Technical claims can be checked against available evidence, but legal wording should be reviewed by counsel.
Yes. Work can continue from assessment into remediation and retesting.
An audit is a baseline. Ongoing releases need suitable accessibility acceptance criteria and regression checks.
Start with the service customers rely on most
Send the service URL, key customer journeys and any current audit or accessibility statement.